Is the judge liable for the compensation of ECHR judgments?

Все новости

Все

04/25/2024 12:47 Западные кураторы обвели турок вокруг пальца - Каринэ Геворгян 04/25/2024 09:32 Москва попросила Ереван разъяснить недавние заявления Алена Симоняна 04/25/2024 17:13 Индия отреагировала на обвинения Азербайджана в поставках оружия Армении 04/26/2024 15:50 Парламент Армении получил обращение Совфеда РФ по поводу заявлений Алена Симоняна 04/25/2024 14:38 В МИД России выразили сожаление из-за публичной критики ОДКБ со стороны властей Армении 04/25/2024 14:55 Россия всегда воспринимала Геноцид армян как собственную боль и беду - Захарова 04/25/2024 15:17 Захарова: комплекс трехсторонних договоренностей лидеров Армении, России и Азербайджана сохраняет свою актуальность 04/25/2024 17:32 Спикер парламента Армении положительно относится к идее закупке газа у Азербайджана 04/25/2024 14:48 Вице-премьера РФ Оверчука спросили, будет ли Пашинян участвовать в саммите ЕАЭС в Москве 04/25/2024 14:21 Депутату НС Армении Гарнику Даниеляну стало плохо во время акции в Тавуше, его доставили в больницу 04/25/2024 16:02 "Никто ничего не сдает": Ален Симонян о происходящем в Тавуше 04/25/2024 13:59 Стычки начались на трассе Ереван-Мегри, Герасима Варданяна подвергли приводу(ВИДЕО) 04/25/2024 17:48 "Закон об иноагентах" закроет путь Грузии в ЕС – резолюция Европарламента 04/25/2024 13:00 Граждане в знак поддержки жителей Тавуша перекрыли Севанскую трассу 04/25/2024 11:09 В трех селах Тавушской области Армении бойкотируют занятия 04/25/2024 16:27 В Армении потребовали возбудить уголовное дело против Пашиняна 04/25/2024 11:45 Демонстранты в знак поддержки жителей Тавуша перекрыли дорогу Ереван-Гюмри 04/26/2024 17:26 Депутата парламента Армении Артура Хачатряна подвергли приводу в ходе акции неповиновения(ВИДЕО) 04/25/2024 09:59 В Европе бьют тревогу из-за распространения смертельного вируса 04/26/2024 16:59 Для спасения Родины нет запрещенных средств, кроме сделки с дьяволом - архиепископ Микаэл Аджапанян

Is the judge liable for the compensation of ECHR judgments? 04/30/2013 17:32 | По закону

Ara Ghazaryan
Deputy Director of “Arni consult” advocacy office

- Artak Zeynalyan and me have talked from different chairs multiple times, had trials by which we want to reach the point that the judge should not be subjected to responsibility for the decisions made. Broadly saying, no official should be subjected to punishment for the decision made if he/she has not committed a crime. It is a different issue if he/she committed a crime or a misdemeanor.

One subject should be punished- the state. The state, which appointed the police officer who cannot be a police officer should.

Therefore, in all the cases when the regress claim is in question, instead of punishing the judge, the prosecutor or the investigator, the state should be punished.

This means that citizens should have the right to enter into the state treasury and receive money from there for moral or material damage. That money is the taxpayer’s money. In this case, the taxpayers would be obliged to leave to the streets for rallies, to complain how the state wasted their money by appointing irresponsible judge, attorney or investigator.

In this case, we have a democratic self-governance, when the taxpayer will not sit at home looking at a cup of coffee, and at how March 1 is carried out, in that case he/she will be next to Myasnikyan monument to fight.

Therefore, in each case, when the violation was made by the official person and that is not a crime or a misdemeanor then the state should be liable. Let regress claim go against the state.

And we are trying to reach that in the trial.

We already have a trial where we have reached that point where the government compensates the attorney’s fees, court costs, but still we are unable to get the compensation for moral damage. If it is stated then the official person will be more vigilant, as due to his fault the state or his office budget will be emptied. That means he works bad.

But today, even if he/she makes a violation, then a service investigation will be carried out, an admonition will be received and that’s all.

That in itself influences the institution of judicial independence. When the President was at the Court of Appeals, a new idea was expressed, that we have never heard from the executive body. We have been saying that for three-four years, nobody was responding to that, but suddenly we received a response from the presidential administration: yes, subject them to disciplinary charge, but be careful so that the judicial independence is not hurt.

This was a new idea, we were frankly surprised. For many years already, based on the document of Venice Commission, we have been saying that the judge should not be subjected to disciplinary action for the wrong application of the non-pecuniary right. The judge makes the decision based on the personal analysis of the facts and personal knowledge of the law.

Around the world the decision of the judge can be questioned only one body, the superior authority, through the grievance procedure. That postulate should operate.

Generally, there are three fields where no one is allowed to enter except the superior court: that is the interpretation of the law, the application of law based on the facts and the dispute resolution. That can exclusively be decided by that judge and not the Council of Justice or the President, or any Minister.

And if we impose sanctions on the judge with the look back then no one will want to become a judge, notary or police officer. No, the state should be punished, because he/she operates in the name of the state, the state trusted its authorities to the person that did not have a right to be on that position.

Photo by natalydolls.com

Автор Factinfo